Post details: Croaked


Croaked
Permalink

By Ruth D'Alessandro, The Wildlife Gardener

The Wildlife Gardener has amphibian anxiety. Last week, there were NO frogs in the Wildlife Pond. No croaking, no splashing, no churning. In previous years, frogspawn has arrived in the middle of February. The surface was millpond flat, and so was my mood. What has happened?

The wildlife pond, 2010

At first, I put this dearth of amphibians down to the prolonged, harsh winter. Perhaps the newts and frogs hadn’t ventured out of hibernation. That’s fine, they’ll wake up when the time is right. Then my friend in the next village told me that her little pond has 70 frogs in it, so many that it was overflowing and gelatinous with spawn and several female frogs had been drowned by amorous males. I didn’t want 70: fifteen would be enough, five even, but none?

[More:]

Dismayed, I chewed over several theories:

1. Pollution? The spring that feeds the Wildlife Pond comes down from the local golf course. The roads through the course had been salted during the snowy weather. Could salt have washed down into the pond and polluted it? How would I go about testing the pond water?

2. Predation? There was such a proliferation of dragonfly larvae last year that most tadpoles were eaten or maimed. I know a grass snake lives nearby. And those froglets that made it out may have been gobbled up by the hens. Could the foraging hens also have eaten the bugs, worms and slugs that the frogs rely on? However, those froglets would not yet be mature enough to breed this year, so where were their big cousins?

3. Heron? During the cold snap, a heron crashed through the ice and set up home in the pond. Could it have winkled out frogs hibernating in the leaves at the bottom?

Heron

4. Housekeeping? I cleared out all the choking blanketweed last year , cut back the marginal plants and slubbed out some of the leaves. Perhaps the frogs preferred it messy.

Yesterday being Saturday, I had the chance to have a good look in the pond. To my relief I saw three common newts swimming about, and I even heard the burping of a single male frog calling for females. Perhaps that rules out pollution. But my relief was short-lived with the grotesque sight of a male frog clinging to the bloated corpse of a female:

Necrophiliac frog
She’s not faking it, honestly...

Not exactly the fecund churning of previous years, and not boding well for frogspawn.

Today, a warm, spring-tinged day and a little more pond activity – two more adult frogs, but not attached to each other. The dead female is still embraced by what by now must be a rather puzzled male. When will he give up? When she starts to smell? When she’s a skeleton?

At least there is some amphibian activity, but nowhere near the frogfest of previous years. Perhaps the party will kick off next week. I hope so. I love our frogs. I’ll keep you posted.

5 comments so far, see them and add yours here!

Posted on 17th March 2010 at 12 05 am
by The Wildlife Gardener
493 views

Categories: Notes from a Wildlife Garden
PermalinkPermalink
Share |

Comments:

Comment from: ghostmoth Email
I look forward to the next instalment. I don't think male frogs are the brightest of creatures ...
PermalinkPermalink 17/03/10 @ 12:48

 

Comment from: The Wildlife Gardener Email
I hope the next instalment will be more positive, ghostmoth...:-(
PermalinkPermalink 17/03/10 @ 12:51

 

Comment from: Richard Email · http://www.harlequin-survey.org
I would suggest that predation is also unlikely - the newts in my pond have eaten every tadpole, despite my best efforts, for at least the last decade, and we still get plenty of frogspawn every year. The frogs also don't seem to mind pond housekeeping, with no discernible difference before or after in terms of numbers, and I'd be very surprised if the hens can eat anywhere near enough invertebrates to starve the frogs, especially given the slug population explosion over the last 3 wet years, and the way that 2009 was such a great insect year. As for the salt theory, I'd have thought it would be long diluted by now - salt-tolerant species like Danish Scurvy-Grass only grow on the very edges of roads, etc, where the salt pollution is highest - I'd have thought it would be massively diluted by the time it reached your pond. I know that aquatic garden centres do testing kits for aquaria, though I'm not sure whether salt(s) are covered though. There's always the spectres of ranavirus and the chytrid fungus lurking in the background, especially if you have a dead frog in the pond - more info is on the Froglife webpages, but rather hidden.

Hope they come back soon!
PermalinkPermalink 17/03/10 @ 20:27

 

Comment from: The Wildlife Gardener Email
Thank you so much for this information, Richard. It has set my mind at rest regarding some of my concerns. I went to remove the dead frog but it had disappeared - perhaps the male had dragged it into a deeper bit. Newts and frogs coexisted quite happily in the last few years. Very interesting re 2009 being a good insect year - perhaps this would explain the explosion of Odonata nymphs.Ranavirus is my biggest worry, but I also understand that populations can be cyclical and we could be overrun with frogs in 2011!
PermalinkPermalink 17/03/10 @ 21:18

 

Comment from: Richard Email · http://www.harlequin-survey.org
No worries! Ranavirus does tend to be cyclical, flaring up when there's a frog population to support it. At least with a well-populated pond next door there should be a reasonable dispersing population to recolonise your pond sooner or later! 2009 was warm even when it was wet, and the early spring and late winter allowed a lot of species to do really well - I work mainly on lepidoptera and ladybirds, so haven't seen the Odonata figures, but it would make sense that they did well, given the abundance of food for the adults, and also probably the summer rain for the last three years preventing ponds drying out as much
PermalinkPermalink 18/03/10 @ 17:51

 

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site and Naturenet will never, ever, pass it on to anyone else or spam you.
Your website URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
What colour is a lemon? (Start your answer with a capital letter)

The Ranger's Blog

The thoughts and writings of The Virtual Ranger, since 1995 the host and mascot of Naturenet, the UK's most popular independent environmental website; along with interjections from his real-life alter ego, Matthew Chatfield, and others. Featuring not only Naturenet and countryside related stuff, but, as on Naturenet, plenty of other material - more or less at random - that takes The Ranger's fancy. But you can be confident that soon enough he'll be rather sarcastic.

Next post: Deathcap mushrooms: "The south-east Asian Problem"

Search

Misc

Subscribe to The Rangers Blog here

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 7
Nature Blog Network